Jacob da Jew posted an interesting letter to and response by Rabbi Yakov Horowitz on the subject of the age of the universe.
Sara (who has probably never read an uncensored high school biology/geology/history text in her life) asks:
Can I read that book to my children and discuss with them the fact that there are people (even smart people) in the world who believe this, yet help them understand our belief that the Torah – which is the emes – teaches us that the world is 5,768 years old?Don't. Say. Anything. Mean.
I want my children to know that there are people who incorrectly believe this, and I also would like them to hear this from me – and not from someone who doesn’t have proper hashkafos. At the same time, I understand that the theory of evolution is not accepted in the Torah world.
Must. Restrain. Myself.
Rabbi Horowitz responds:
Our own understanding of things, namely the fact that there are objects in our world that appearto be more than 5,766 years old, is not, in and of itself, a contradiction to our emunah. Hashem created a world that was mature and developed. The trees had rings and the stones appeared to be timeworn. In fact, the Midrash states (Bereshis Rabbah 8:14) that Adam was created not as an infant, but rather as an adult with the developed body of a 20-year-old. Thus only two years after the world was created, Adam would have appeared to be 22 years old when it was only two years after he was created. So, too, a tree may have appeared to be hundreds of years old during the second year of creation. The same line of reasoning would apply to stones, canyons, etc.I do not wish to mince words here, but Rabbi Horwitz's response, while well-meaning, is pure and utter hogwash.
Better let Dr. Ken Miller Sc.B, Ph.D, professor of biology at Brown University say it:
(Lest anyone think that Dr. Miller is a militant atheist out on a quest to destroy religion, please remember that he authored Finding Darwin's God: A Scientist's Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution)
[UPDATE: Moshe Y. Gluck points out that Dr. Ken Miller doesn't really address Philip Henry Gosse... er... Rabbi Horowitz's response. Moshe is only partially correct. For most Chareidim, the Omphalos hypothesis is only tenable because deep down (or not, depending on the fanaticism of the said Chareidi) they don't think the evidence for evolution, an ancient universe, etc. is all that convincing. Generally, this is because they have never been exposed to it in any formal way. The Dr. Miller video addresses that point.
However, to respond to the actual claim made by Rabbi Horowitz, better let BrooklynWolf say it.]
J.D.







